Post by Admin on Aug 31, 2013 16:29:52 GMT -5
Change your environment & nutrition, change your genes.
There are less than 2% of diseases are attributable to
gene defect, such as cystic fibrosis, Huntington's chorea
and beta thallasemia etc.
A book published in 1988 "The Origin of Mutants" by Cairns J,
Overbaugh J Miller et al discuss an experiment involving bacteria
which did not the have the gene to use lactose. The only source of
nutrient in its new environment was lactose. It didn't die. It altered
its genetic structure to use the lactose to survive.
Another experiment as described by Waterland et al,(2003) shows the adaptation of
genes to its environment. There are other articles, more recent to this effect
in regards to epigenetic effects of nutrition on genes. Agoutic mice, are fat and
yellowish color. They were fed Vitamin B12, Folic Acid, Choline Betaine. Mouse
offspring were born brown.
"Transposable Elements
Targets For Early Nutritional Effects on Epigenetics Gene Regulation. Waterland
RA, Jirtle; Molecular Cell Bio (2003 August)23(15):5293-300 ISSN: 0270-7306
Will skip on more published papers concerning alteration of DNA, and that RNA
can go against DNA/RNA concept to rewrite DNA. Its said that its should be a bi-
directional flow, and is controlled by the environment. See "Environment Regulatory
Proteins DNA RNA Proteiins. From Heresy to Dogma in accounts of Opposition to Howard
Temin's DNA Provirus Hypothesis; Marcum JA et al..
Will end with this question before posting links to easy to
read articles, exposing the dangerous flaws and myths about
genetics:
Why is it taught that it takes more than 120,000 various proteins
for the human body to work, and there are specific genes to make each protein.
The Human Genome mapped shows 25,000 genes, and over 120,000 proteins in the body.
Confused?
Easy to read article:
The Great DNA Data Deficit: Are Genes for Disease a Mirage?
Just before his appointment as head of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins, the most prominent medical geneticist of our time, had his own genome scanned for disease susceptibility genes. He had decided, so he said, that the technology of personalised genomics was finally mature enough to yield meaningful results. Indeed, the outcome of his scan inspired The Language of Life, his recent book which urges every individual to do the same and secure their place on the personalised genomics bandwagon.
So, what knowledge did Collins's scan produce? His results can be summarised very briefly. For North American males the probability of developing type 2 diabetes is 23%. Collins's own risk was estimated at 29% and he highlighted this as the outstanding finding. For all other common diseases, however, including stroke, cancer, heart disease, and dementia, Collins's likelihood of contracting them was average. Cont/.....
www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/great-dna-data-deficit-are-genes-disease-mirage
There are less than 2% of diseases are attributable to
gene defect, such as cystic fibrosis, Huntington's chorea
and beta thallasemia etc.
A book published in 1988 "The Origin of Mutants" by Cairns J,
Overbaugh J Miller et al discuss an experiment involving bacteria
which did not the have the gene to use lactose. The only source of
nutrient in its new environment was lactose. It didn't die. It altered
its genetic structure to use the lactose to survive.
Another experiment as described by Waterland et al,(2003) shows the adaptation of
genes to its environment. There are other articles, more recent to this effect
in regards to epigenetic effects of nutrition on genes. Agoutic mice, are fat and
yellowish color. They were fed Vitamin B12, Folic Acid, Choline Betaine. Mouse
offspring were born brown.
"Transposable Elements
Targets For Early Nutritional Effects on Epigenetics Gene Regulation. Waterland
RA, Jirtle; Molecular Cell Bio (2003 August)23(15):5293-300 ISSN: 0270-7306
Will skip on more published papers concerning alteration of DNA, and that RNA
can go against DNA/RNA concept to rewrite DNA. Its said that its should be a bi-
directional flow, and is controlled by the environment. See "Environment Regulatory
Proteins DNA RNA Proteiins. From Heresy to Dogma in accounts of Opposition to Howard
Temin's DNA Provirus Hypothesis; Marcum JA et al..
Will end with this question before posting links to easy to
read articles, exposing the dangerous flaws and myths about
genetics:
Why is it taught that it takes more than 120,000 various proteins
for the human body to work, and there are specific genes to make each protein.
The Human Genome mapped shows 25,000 genes, and over 120,000 proteins in the body.
Confused?
Easy to read article:
The Great DNA Data Deficit: Are Genes for Disease a Mirage?
Just before his appointment as head of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Francis Collins, the most prominent medical geneticist of our time, had his own genome scanned for disease susceptibility genes. He had decided, so he said, that the technology of personalised genomics was finally mature enough to yield meaningful results. Indeed, the outcome of his scan inspired The Language of Life, his recent book which urges every individual to do the same and secure their place on the personalised genomics bandwagon.
So, what knowledge did Collins's scan produce? His results can be summarised very briefly. For North American males the probability of developing type 2 diabetes is 23%. Collins's own risk was estimated at 29% and he highlighted this as the outstanding finding. For all other common diseases, however, including stroke, cancer, heart disease, and dementia, Collins's likelihood of contracting them was average. Cont/.....
www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/great-dna-data-deficit-are-genes-disease-mirage